From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Usufy

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Dec 1, 2010
2:10-mc-00081 JAM KJN (E.D. Cal. Dec. 1, 2010)

Opinion


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and LESLIE FOUCHE-MUNOZ, Revenue Officer, Internal Revenue Service, Petitioners, v. YOUNES USUFY, Respondent. No. 2:10-mc-00081 JAM KJN United States District Court, E.D. California. December 1, 2010

          ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

          KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge.

         This matter was set for hearing before the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge for December 2, 2010. On November 30, 2010, Yoshinori Himel, Assistant United States Attorney, filed a notice that respondent sufficiently complied with the tax summons at issue. (Dkt. No. 10.) Petitioners further requested that the court take the related civil order to show cause off of its December 2, 2010 calendar.

         Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that the hearing on the petition to enforce the tax summons previously set for December 2, 2010 at 10:00 a.m. shall be VACATED.

         Further, it is HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice as moot and that the Clerk of Court be directed to close this case.

         These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Id .; see also Local Rule 304(b). Such a document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Any response to the objections shall be filed with the court and served on all parties within fourteen days after service of the objections. Local Rule 304(d). Failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Turner v. Duncan , 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst , 951 F.2d 1153, 1156-57 (9th Cir. 1991).


Summaries of

United States v. Usufy

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Dec 1, 2010
2:10-mc-00081 JAM KJN (E.D. Cal. Dec. 1, 2010)
Case details for

United States v. Usufy

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and LESLIE FOUCHE-MUNOZ, Revenue Officer…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Dec 1, 2010

Citations

2:10-mc-00081 JAM KJN (E.D. Cal. Dec. 1, 2010)