From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Uriostigue-Baena

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Apr 4, 2013
Case No. 2:04-CR-0433-KJD-RJJ (D. Nev. Apr. 4, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 2:04-CR-0433-KJD-RJJ

04-04-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JOSE URIOSTIGUE-BAENA, Defendant.


ORDER

Presently before the Court is Defendant's Motion for Sentence Adjustment (#65). The Government filed a response in opposition (#66). Defendant seeks to have his sentence adjusted asserting that his status as a deportable alien makes his imprisonment more severe because he is ineligible to be released to a halfway house or residential drug abuse program.

The Court must deny the motion. First, Defendant was sentenced to a seventy (70) month term of incarceration in July 2005. Therefore, his motion is likely moot as he has already been released. Second, the Court is without authority to modify his term of imprisonment. See United States v. Smart, 129 F.3d 539, 540-41 (10th Cir. 1997); 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c). Third, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has rejected this Equal Protection argument. See de Jesus Melendez v. Gonzalez, 503 F.3d 1019 (9th Cir. 2007). Finally, if brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, Defendant's claim is time-barred.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Sentence Adjustment (#65) is DENIED.

____________________

Kent J. Dawson

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Uriostigue-Baena

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Apr 4, 2013
Case No. 2:04-CR-0433-KJD-RJJ (D. Nev. Apr. 4, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Uriostigue-Baena

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JOSE URIOSTIGUE-BAENA, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Apr 4, 2013

Citations

Case No. 2:04-CR-0433-KJD-RJJ (D. Nev. Apr. 4, 2013)