Opinion
22-6565
02-23-2023
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DARYL BERNARD TYSON, Defendant-Appellant.
Daryl Bernard Tyson, Appellant Pro Se.
UNPUBLISHED
Submitted: February 21, 2023
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (4:10-cr-00094-D-1; 4:20-cv-00065-D)
Daryl Bernard Tyson, Appellant Pro Se.
Before NIEMEYER and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM
Daryl Bernard Tyson appeals the district court's order denying his motion for compassionate release. We have reviewed the record on appeal and conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying relief. See United States v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir.) (providing standard), cert. denied, 142 S.Ct. 383 (2021). Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. Tyson, Nos. 4:10-cr-00094-D-1; 4:20-cv-00065-D (E.D. N.C. Apr. 25, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED