From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Turner

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Apr 9, 2018
Case No. 2:12-cr-20617 (E.D. Mich. Apr. 9, 2018)

Opinion

Case No. 2:12-cr-20617

04-09-2018

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ALVIN JULIAN TURNER, Defendant.


OPINION IN SUPPORT OF THE COURT'S REFUSAL TO REDUCE DEFENDANT'S SENTENCE

In September 2017, the Court denied Defendant's Motion to Reduce Sentence. ECF 53. Defendant appealed, and the Sixth Circuit issued a limited remand for the Court to "provide an explanation for its reasons for refusing to reduce [Defendant's] sentence." ECF 56, PgID 330. The parties do not appear to dispute that the Court may reduce the sentence; the issue is whether the Court should exercise its discretion to do so. ECF 57, PgID 332; ECF 58, PgID 342. The Court refused to exercise its discretion in Defendant's favor for several reasons.

First, Defendant has an extensive history of criminality. Defendant's disrespect for the law continually escalated since 1994. ECF 20, PgID 52. Additionally, Defendant committed his current crime while on supervised release for an almost identical crime. Id. Consequently, Defendant's argument that he has now "changed" is unpersuasive. Defendant distributed a large quantity of cocaine, served ten years in prison, and then made the calculated decision to again distribute a large quantity of cocaine. Because Defendant did not respond to 120 months' imprisonment in the past, a longer sentence will provide an appropriate punishment and perhaps deter him from distributing cocaine in the future.

Second, Defendant has shown violent tendencies while incarcerated. Specifically, Defendant was involved in at least one incident of possessing a hazardous tool, assaulting an individual, and destroying evidence. ECF 48-2, PgID 298-99 (under seal). Defendant obviously struggles with impulse control, discipline, and respect for authority. The Court finds that Defendant's current sentence is more likely to help him address those issues while he continues to progress in the classroom.

For these reasons, the Court denied Defendant's Motion to Reduce Sentence.

SO ORDERED.

s/ Stephen J. Murphy, III

STEPHEN J. MURPHY, III

United States District Judge Dated: April 9, 2018 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties and/or counsel of record on April 9, 2018, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/ David Parker

Case Manager


Summaries of

United States v. Turner

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Apr 9, 2018
Case No. 2:12-cr-20617 (E.D. Mich. Apr. 9, 2018)
Case details for

United States v. Turner

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ALVIN JULIAN TURNER, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Apr 9, 2018

Citations

Case No. 2:12-cr-20617 (E.D. Mich. Apr. 9, 2018)