Those convictions were affirmed on appeal. See United States v. Turner, 629 Fed.Appx. 66 (2d Cir. Oct. 26, 2015). Turner now moves to vacate his convictions and sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255.

Upon review of the sentenced imposed by other federal district courts in the Second Circuit, the Court finds the sentenced imposed here to be sufficient, but not greater than necessary, to comply with the purposes of sentencing. See United States v. Glenn, 629 F. App'x 150, 151 (2d Cir. 2015) (upholding as procedurally reasonable an above-Guidelines 55-month imprisonment sentence for bank fraud and escape from custody because of a likelihood of recidivism); United States v. Turner, 629 F. App'x 66, 67 (2d Cir. 2015) (upholding as substantively reasonable a below-Guidelines sentence of 74 months of imprisonment for conspiracy to commit wire and bank fraud, bank fraud, and aggravated identity theft because of evidence of familial support); United States v. Kottage, 510 F. App'x 23 (2d Cir. 2013) (upholding sentence of 41 months of imprisonment for conspiracy to commit wire fraud and conspiracy to commit bank fraud); United States v. Villar, 09 CR. 435-01, 2013 WL 2436559, at *7 (S.D.N.Y. June 5, 2013) (Sweet, J.) (sentencing the defendant to 33 months of imprisonment for conspiring to commit wire fraud and bank fraud). Defendant's sentence avoids any unwarranted sentence disparities among the defendants in light of the reasons stated in this memorandum and order.