From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Tucker

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jan 27, 2022
2:21-CV-2049 JCM (NJK) (D. Nev. Jan. 27, 2022)

Opinion

2:21-CV-2049 JCM (NJK)

01-27-2022

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiffs, v. CHRISTOPHER TUCKER, Defendants.


ORDER

Presently before the court are Dennis L. Perez and Jonathan Kalinski's (“petitioners”) verified petitions for permission to practice pro hac vice. (ECF Nos. 5 and 6). The petitions are both defective as the designation of local counsel in both petitions lists an attorney with an address outside the state of Nevada. Pursuant to LR IA 11 -2(d), petitioners must associate with a resident member of the bar of this court as co-counsel. Petitioners also failed to answer items five and six of their respective applications.

Petitioners are instructed to refile corrected petitions with designation of local counsel who is a resident member of the bar of this court and provide answers to all requested items within the petitions.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Perez and Kalinski's verified petitions for permission to practice pro hac vice (ECF Nos. 5 and 6) be, and the same hereby are, DENIED without prejudice.


Summaries of

United States v. Tucker

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jan 27, 2022
2:21-CV-2049 JCM (NJK) (D. Nev. Jan. 27, 2022)
Case details for

United States v. Tucker

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiffs, v. CHRISTOPHER TUCKER, Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Jan 27, 2022

Citations

2:21-CV-2049 JCM (NJK) (D. Nev. Jan. 27, 2022)