Opinion
2:21-cv-02049-JCM-NJK
01-27-2022
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. CHRISTOPHER TUCKER, Defendant.
DENNIS L. PEREZ, ESQ., CA Bar No. 106555 PRO HAC VICE PENDING JONATHAN KALINSKI, ESQ. CA Bar No. 245449 PRO HAC VICE PENDING HOCHMAN SALKIN TOSCHER PEREZ P.C. Attorneys for Defendant CHRISTOPHER TUCKER
DENNIS L. PEREZ, ESQ., CA Bar No. 106555 PRO HAC VICE PENDING JONATHAN KALINSKI, ESQ. CA Bar No. 245449 PRO HAC VICE PENDING HOCHMAN SALKIN TOSCHER PEREZ P.C. Attorneys for Defendant CHRISTOPHER TUCKER
MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE AN ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO THE PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT
NANCY J. KOPPE, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Pursuant to Rule 6(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule IA 6-1(a), Defendant, Christopher Tucker (“Mr. Tucker”), hereby moves the Court to enlarge the time in which Mr. Tucker must answer or otherwise respond to the Plaintiff's Complaint, for an additional thirty (30) days, up to and including March 2, 2021.
In support of this Motion, Mr. Tucker states the following:
1. On November 15, 2021, the United States of America filed a Complaint seeking to reduce federal tax assessments to judgment.
2. The United States requested that Mr. Tucker waive service of summons in this action along with a copy of the Complaint on December 2, 2021. Mr. Tucker returned an executed waiver on December 13, 2021.
3. Having executed a waiver, Mr. Tucker is required to answer or otherwise respond to the Plaintiff's Complaint by Monday, January 31, 2022.
4. Mr. Tucker is in the process of answering Plaintiff's Complaint but needs additional time to review the extensive procedural history of the case.
5. This is the first motion to extend time to file the answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint.
6. On January 24, 2022, counsel for Plaintiff informed Mr. Tucker's counsel that it does not oppose this motion.
For the above reasons, Mr. Tucker respectfully requests that the Court extend the time to file an Answer to March 2, 2022.
IT IS SO ORDERED.