From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Truong

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 31, 2012
Case No. 09-421 GEB (E.D. Cal. Jul. 31, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 09-421 GEB

07-31-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. GARY TRUONG, Defendant.

DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar #89424 Federal Defender MICHAEL PETRIK, Jr., Bar #177913 Assistant Federal Defender Attorneys for Defendant GARY TRUONG


DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar #89424

Federal Defender

MICHAEL PETRIK, Jr., Bar #177913

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorneys for Defendant

GARY TRUONG

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE TO

AUGUST 31, 2012, AT 9:00 A.M.


Date: August 3, 2012

Judge: Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

THE PARTIES STIPULATE, through their respective attorneys, that the Court should vacate the status conference scheduled for August 3, 2012, at 9:00 a.m., and reset it for August 31, 2012, at 9:00 a.m.

Counsel for defendant requires further time to review discovery, to confer with client, and to prepare.

The parties further stipulate that the Court should exclude the period from the date of this order through August 31, 2012, when it computes the time within which the trial of the above criminal prosecution must commence for purposes of the Speedy Trial Act. The parties stipulate that the ends of justice served by granting defendant's request for a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, and that this is an appropriate exclusion of time for defense preparation within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv) (Local Code T4).

Respectfully submitted,

DANIEL BRODERICK

Federal Defender

________________________

MICHAEL PETRIK, Jr.

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorneys GARY TRUONG

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

________________________

JASON HITT

Assistant U.S. Attorney

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED. The Court orders time excluded from the date of this order through the status conference on August 31, 2012, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv) (Local Code T4). The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting defendant's request for a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

________________________

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Truong

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 31, 2012
Case No. 09-421 GEB (E.D. Cal. Jul. 31, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Truong

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. GARY TRUONG, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 31, 2012

Citations

Case No. 09-421 GEB (E.D. Cal. Jul. 31, 2012)