Opinion
Case No. 09-421 GEB
09-14-2011
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. VI TRUONG, aka Ken Vi Truong; GARY TRUONG, Defendants.
DANIEL BRODERICK Federal Defender MICHAEL PETRIK, Jr. Assistant Federal Defender Attorneys GARY TRUONG M.Petrik for Douglas Horngrad DOUGLAS HORNGRAD Attorney for VI TRUONG BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney M.Petrik for Jason Hitt JASON HITT Assistant U.S. Attorney
DANIEL J. BRODERICK, #89424
Federal Defender
MICHAEL PETRIK, Jr., #177913
Assistant Federal Defender
Attorneys for Defendant
GARY TRUONG
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE TO
OCTOBER 21, 2011, AT 9:00 A.M.
Date: September 16, 2011
Time: 9:00 a.m.
Judge: Garland E. Burrell, Jr.
THE PARTIES STIPULATE, through their respective attorneys, that the Court should vacate the status conference scheduled for September 16, 2011, at 9:00 a.m., and reset it for October 21, 2011, at 9:00 a.m.
Counsel for defendants require further time to review discovery, to confer, and to prepare.
The parties further stipulate that the Court should exclude the period from the date of this order through October 21, 2011, when it computes the time within which the trial of the above criminal prosecution must commence for purposes of the Speedy Trial Act. The parties stipulate that the ends of justice served by granting defendants' request for a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendants' in a speedy trial, and that this is an appropriate exclusion of time for defense preparation within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv) (Local Code T4).
Respectfully submitted,
DANIEL BRODERICK
Federal Defender
MICHAEL PETRIK, Jr.
Assistant Federal Defender
Attorneys GARY TRUONG
M.Petrik for Douglas Horngrad
DOUGLAS HORNGRAD
Attorney for VI TRUONG
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
M.Petrik for Jason Hitt
JASON HITT
Assistant U.S. Attorney
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED. The Court orders time excluded from the date of this order through the status conference on October 21, 2011, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv) (Local Code T4). The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting defendants' request for a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendants' in a speedy trial.
GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.
United States District Judge