From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Trujillo-Bravo

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jun 24, 2005
137 F. App'x 60 (9th Cir. 2005)

Opinion

Submitted June 14, 2005.

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Gary M. Restaino, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Atmore L. Baggot, Atmore Baggot Attorney at Law, Apache Junction, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.


Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona; Paul G. Rosenblatt, District Judge, Presiding.

Before KLEINFELD, TASHIMA, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Emilio Trujillo-Bravo appeals the 37-month sentence imposed after his guilty

Page 61.

plea conviction for illegal re-entry into the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S. C.§ 1291.

We dismiss in light of the valid written appeal waiver. See United States v. Nguyen, 235 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th Cir.2000) (stating that an appeal waiver is valid when it is entered knowingly and voluntarily); United States v. Cardenas, 405 F.3d 1046, 1048 (9th Cir.2005) (holding that the changes in sentencing law imposed by United States v. Booker, --- U.S. ----, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), did not render waiver of appeal involuntary and unknowing).

DISMISSED.


Summaries of

United States v. Trujillo-Bravo

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jun 24, 2005
137 F. App'x 60 (9th Cir. 2005)
Case details for

United States v. Trujillo-Bravo

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Emilio TRUJILLO-BRAVO…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jun 24, 2005

Citations

137 F. App'x 60 (9th Cir. 2005)