From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Tresselt

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Jan 8, 2013
CR-2-12-104 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 8, 2013)

Opinion

CR-2-12-104

01-08-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ANTHONY J. TRESSELT, Defendant.


JUDGE MARBLEY


FINAL ORDER OF FORFEITURE

WHEREAS, on September 25, 2012, this Court entered a Preliminary Order of Forfeiture, ordering the above-named Defendant, Anthony J. Tresselt to forfeit to the United States the Defendant's interest in the property subject to forfeiture in Forfeiture A of the Information pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§2253(a)(1) and (3);

WHEREAS, for 3 0 consecutive days beginning September 27, 2012, the United States published notice of this forfeiture on the government's internet site www.forfeiture.gov, which provided potential claimants notice of this forfeiture and of the intent of the United States to dispose of the forfeited property in accordance with the law and further notifying all third parties of their right to petition the Court within sixty (60) days of the initial publication date for a hearing to adjudicate the validity of their alleged legal interest in the property. There are no parties known to the United States who may have interest in the subject property;

WHEREAS, on December 7, 2012, this Court held Defendant, Anthony J. Tresselt's sentencing hearing and verbally pronounced the forfeiture of the subject property and thereafter on December 12, 2012, issued its Judgment ordering Defendant, Anthony J. Tresselt to forfeit to the United States the property described herein; WHEREAS, no petitions asserting a legal interest in the forfeited property were filed and the time for the filing of such petitions has expired;

WHEREAS, the Court finds that Defendant, Anthony J. Tresselt had an interest in the property that is subject to forfeiture pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §2253(a)(l) and (3) for violations of 18 U.S.C. §2252(a)(4)(B);

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED:

1. That all right, title and interest in and to the hereinafter described property be and is hereby FORFEITED to the United States of America, said property being described as:

(A) All matter containing said visual depictions or child pornography and child erotica, transported, mailed, shipped, and possessed in violation of 18 U.S.C. §2252(a)(4)(B); and
(B) All property used and intended to be used to commit and to promote the commission of the aforementioned violation, including but not limited to the following:
(1) One (1) Dell laptop computer, SN: JRPZBH1, including its contents; and
(2) One (1) HP 8565C computer, SN: US94169963, including its contents.

2. That the designated agent for Immigration and Customs Enforcement / Homeland Security Investigations shall dispose of the property according to law.

3. That any and all claims and interests in and to the above described forfeited property are forever barred and no right, title or interest in the forfeited property shall exist in any other person or entity, and the United States of America shall have clear title to said property and may warrant good title thereto.

______________________________

HONORABLE ALGENON L. MARBLEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Tresselt

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Jan 8, 2013
CR-2-12-104 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 8, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Tresselt

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ANTHONY J. TRESSELT, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Jan 8, 2013

Citations

CR-2-12-104 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 8, 2013)