From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Tillman

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Oct 22, 2013
543 F. App'x 623 (9th Cir. 2013)

Opinion

Submitted October 15, 2013

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 32.1)

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. D.C. No. 2:11-cr-01036-CAS. Christina A. Snyder, District Judge, Presiding.

For UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee: Jean-Claude Andre, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Gregory Lesser, Assistant U.S. Attorney, OFFICE OF THE U.S. ATTORNEY, Los Angeles, CA.

TERRALL EUGENE TILLMAN, Defendant - Appellant, Pro se, Lompoc, CA.


Before: FISHER, GOULD, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Terrall Eugene Tillman appeals from district court's judgment and challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 120-month sentence for distribution of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(A)(viii). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Tillman's counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Tillman the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Tillman waived his right to appeal his conviction, with the exception of an appeal based on a claim that his plea was involuntary. He also waived the right to appeal most aspects of his sentence. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief as to Tillman's plea or any aspects of the sentence not covered by the sentencing appeal waiver. We therefore affirm as to those issues. We dismiss the remainder of the appeal in light of the valid appeal waivers. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 988 (9th Cir. 2009).

We remand to the district court with instructions to amend the judgment to delete " Possession with Intent to Distribute," and replace it with " Distribution of," and to reflect that Tillman was convicted of violating 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(A)(viii).

Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED in part; DISMISSED in part; REMANDED to correct the judgment.


Summaries of

United States v. Tillman

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Oct 22, 2013
543 F. App'x 623 (9th Cir. 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Tillman

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. TERRALL EUGENE TILLMAN…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Oct 22, 2013

Citations

543 F. App'x 623 (9th Cir. 2013)