From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Tilles

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Nov 30, 2021
21-cr-20171 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 30, 2021)

Opinion

21-cr-20171

11-30-2021

United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Demarco Tilles, Defendant.

MICHAEL EL-ZEIN Assistant U.S. Attorney TODD SHANKER Attorney for Defendant


MICHAEL EL-ZEIN Assistant U.S. Attorney

TODD SHANKER Attorney for Defendant

STIPULATED PRELIMINARY ORDER OF FORFEITURE

Hon. Robert H. Cleland United States District Judge

Plaintiff, by and through its undersigned attorney, together with the defendant, Demarco Tilles, by and through his attorney Todd Shanker, (collectively, “the Parties”), submit this Stipulated Preliminary Order of Forfeiture to the Court for immediate entry, and stipulate and agree to the following:

On March 10, 2021, an Indictment was filed charging the defendant with Count One, Felon in Possession of a Firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). (ECF No. 15).

The Indictment contains forfeiture allegations under 18 U.S.C. § 924(d) and 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c), giving notice to the defendant that upon his conviction of the offense charged in the Indictment, the defendant shall forfeit, under 18 U.S.C. 1

§ 924(d) and 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c), any firearm and ammunition involved in or used in the knowing commission of the charged offense.

On or about April 30, 2021, the United States filed a First Forfeiture Bill of Particulars to more specifically identify the property to be forfeited under 18 U.S.C. § 924(d) and 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c). (ECF No. 24). The Forfeiture Bill of Particulars gave notice of the Government's intent to forfeit upon the defendant's conviction, the following property:

a. One Smith and Wesson Pistol, Model: M&P 9, M2.0, CAL:9, Serial No: JDY2889; and
b. Assorted Ammunition, QTY:8, CAL:9 (“Subject Property”).

On July 15, 2021, the defendant entered into a Rule 11 Plea Agreement (“Rule 11”) and pleaded guilty to Count One charging him with Felon in Possession of a Firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). (ECF No. 29).

In the Rule 11, the defendant agreed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 924(d) and 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c) to forfeit to the United States any firearm and ammunition involved in or used in his knowing violation of the charged offense which includes the Subject Property. (ECF No. 29, PageID.96).

The defendant further agreed to the entry of one or more orders of forfeiture, including the entry of a Preliminary Order of Forfeiture, incorporating the forfeiture 2 of the above referenced property following his guilty plea, upon application by the United States at, or any time before, his sentencing in this case. (ECF No. 29, PageID.96). The defendant also expressly waived his right to have a jury determine the forfeitability of his interest in the above identified firearm and ammunition as provided by Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure 32.2(b)(5). Id.

In his Rule 11, the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived any challenge to the above described forfeiture based upon the Excessive Fines Clause of the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution. (ECF No. 29, PageID.97). He further acknowledged that he understood that the forfeiture of assets is part of the sentence that may be imposed in this case and waived his right to challenge any failure by the court to advise him of this pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(b)(1)(J). Id.

In entering into this Stipulation with respect to forfeiture, the defendant agrees to immediate entry of this Stipulated Preliminary Order of Forfeiture and agrees that this Order shall become final as to the defendant at entry. The defendant's counsel, Todd Shanker, affirms that he has discussed this Stipulated Order with the defendant and that the defendant consents to the entry of the Stipulated Order of Forfeiture.

Based on the defendant's guilty plea and Rule 11, this Stipulation, and other information in the record, and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 924(d)(1) together with 28 3

U.S.C. § 2461(c), and Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.2, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The Subject Property IS HEREBY FORFEITED to the United States pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 924(d)(1) together with 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c), and Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.2 for disposition according to law, and any right, title and interest of the defendant, and any right, title and interest that his heirs, successors or assigns have, or may have, in the Subject Property is HEREBY AND FOREVER EXTINGUISHED.

2. Upon entry of this order, the United States shall publish on www.forfeiture.gov, notice of this preliminary forfeiture order and of its intent to dispose of the Subject Property in such manner as the Attorney General may direct, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 853(n). Said notice shall direct that any person, other than the defendant, asserting a legal interest in the Subject Property may file a petition with the Court within thirty (30) days of the final publication of notice or of receipt of actual notice, whichever is earlier. The petition shall be for a hearing before the Court alone, without a jury and in accordance with 21 U.S.C. § 853(n), to adjudicate the validity of the petitioner's alleged interest in the Subject Property. The petition must identify petitioner's alleged right, title, or interest in the Subject Property, the time and circumstances of the petitioner's acquisition of the right, title, or interest in the Subject Property, 4 any additional facts supporting the petitioner's claim, and the relief sought. The United States may also, to the extent practicable, provide direct written notice to any person or entity known to have an alleged interest in the Subject Property.

3. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.2(b)(4), this Order shall become final as to the defendant at sentencing. If no third party files a timely claim, this Order shall become the Final Order of Forfeiture, as provided by Rule 32.2(c)(2).

4. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce this Order, and to amend it as necessary, pursuant to Rule 32.2.

Agreed as to form and substance:

IT IS SO ORDERED. 5


Summaries of

United States v. Tilles

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Nov 30, 2021
21-cr-20171 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 30, 2021)
Case details for

United States v. Tilles

Case Details

Full title:United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Demarco Tilles, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Nov 30, 2021

Citations

21-cr-20171 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 30, 2021)