United States v. Tiedeman

Full title: UNITED STATES v. VAUGHN TIEDEMAN

Court: United States District Court, D. New Jersey

Date published: Nov 17, 2021

Crim. 19-875 (D.N.J. Nov. 17, 2021)

Opinion

Crim. 19-875

11-17-2021

UNITED STATES v. VAUGHN TIEDEMAN

Honorable Susan D. Wigenton, United States District Judge.

ORDER REGARDING USE OF VIDEO CONFERENCING/TELECONFERENCING FOR FELONY PLEAS AND/OR SENTENCINGS

Honorable Susan D. Wigenton, United States District Judge.

In accordance with Standing Order 2020-06, this Court finds:

[√] That the Defendant (or the Juvenile) has consented to the use of video teleconferencing/teleconferencing to conduct the proceeding(s) held today, after consultation with counsel; and

[√] That the proceeding(s) to be held today cannot be further delayed without serious harm to the interests of justice, for the following specific reasons:

The defendant has requested that the plea hearing be held via videoconference in the interest of a speedy resolution to these proceedings. The Government consents to proceeding by videoconference.

Accordingly, the proceeding(s) held on this date may be conducted by:

[√] Video Teleconferencing

[ ] Teleconferencing, because video teleconferencing is not reasonably available for the following reason:

[ ] The Defendant (or the Juvenile) is detained at a facility lacking video teleconferencing capability.

[] Other: