From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Thursby

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
May 23, 2014
3:12-CR-007-O(01) (N.D. Tex. May. 23, 2014)

Opinion

3:12-CR-007-O(01)

05-23-2014

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. DAVID EUGENE THURSBY, Defendant.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF

THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions and a recommendation in this case. Plaintiff/Petitioner filed objections, and the District Court has made a de novo review of those portions of the proposed findings and recommendation to which objection was made. The objections are overruled, and the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant's motion to reduce sentence [Doc. 99] is DENIED for lack of jurisdiction.

The Clerk of the Court is directed to open for indexing purposes a new habeas corpus action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (nature of suit 530 -- assigned to the same district judge and magistrate judge) and to close the same on the basis of the order accepting this recommendation.

The Court prospectively CERTIFIES that any appeal of this action would not be taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); FED. R. APP. P. 24(a)(3). In support of this finding, the Court adopts and incorporates by reference the Magistrate Judge's Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation. See Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 n.21 (5th Cir. 1997). Based on the Findings and Recommendation, the Court finds that any appeal of this action would present no legal point of arguable merit and would, therefore, be frivolous. Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983). In the event of an appeal, Plaintiff may challenge this certification by filing a separate motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal with the Clerk of the Court, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. See Baugh, 117 F.3d at 202; FED. R. APP. P. 24(a)(5).

Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a) governs the time to appeal an order. A timely notice of appeal must be filed even if the district court certifies an appeal as not taken in good faith.

__________

Reed O'Connor

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Thursby

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
May 23, 2014
3:12-CR-007-O(01) (N.D. Tex. May. 23, 2014)
Case details for

United States v. Thursby

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. DAVID EUGENE THURSBY, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: May 23, 2014

Citations

3:12-CR-007-O(01) (N.D. Tex. May. 23, 2014)