From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Thompson

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jun 26, 2018
No. 18-6300 (4th Cir. Jun. 26, 2018)

Opinion

No. 18-6300

06-26-2018

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Petitioner - Appellee, v. JON KARL THOMPSON, Respondent - Appellant.

Jon Karl Thompson, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:15-hc-02253-FL) Before DIAZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jon Karl Thompson, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Jon Karl Thompson appeals the district court's orders denying his motions for appointment of a guardian ad litem and for transfer to Arkansas. Our review of the record discloses that Thompson failed to demonstrate entitlement to appointment of a guardian ad litem under Fed. R. Civ. P. 17(c). Nor has he demonstrated that Arkansas is willing to accept responsibility for his custody, care and treatment. See 18 U.S.C. § 4248(d) (2012). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

United States v. Thompson

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jun 26, 2018
No. 18-6300 (4th Cir. Jun. 26, 2018)
Case details for

United States v. Thompson

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Petitioner - Appellee, v. JON KARL THOMPSON…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jun 26, 2018

Citations

No. 18-6300 (4th Cir. Jun. 26, 2018)