From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Thompson

United States District Court, Northern District of Oklahoma
Aug 18, 2022
No. 22-CR-118-JFH (N.D. Okla. Aug. 18, 2022)

Opinion

22-CR-118-JFH

08-18-2022

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. GARRIN MICHAEL THOMPSON, Defendant.


OPINION AND ORDER

JOHN F. HEIL, III, DISTRICT JUDGE

Before the Court is a sealed motion to determine Indian country as a matter of law (“Motion”) filed by the United States of America (“Government”). Dkt. No. 70. The Government seeks a determination that 1004 West Fargo Lane, Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 is within the boundaries of the Muscogee (Creek) Nation. Id. at 1. The Government represents that defense counsel does not object to the Motion. Dkt. No. 66 at 2.

Generally, when defense counsel does not object to an Indian country determination motion, the Court encourages the parties to consider a stipulation on the matter. However, in this case, defense counsel has not been able to make contact with his client to determine whether Defendant Garrin Michael Thompson (“Defendant”) agrees to a stipulation. Therefore, the Court proceeds to the merits of the Motion.

A “district court can find, as a matter of law, a geographic area or particular location is Indian Country, and then instruct the jury to determine factually whether the offense occurred there.” United States v. Roberts, 185 F.3d 1125, 1139-40 (10th Cir. 1999). The party seeking to invoke the jurisdiction of a federal court must demonstrate by a preponderance of the evidence that the case is within the Court's jurisdiction. United States v. Bustillos, 31 F.3d 931, 933 (10th Cir. 1994).

Here the Government submits for the Court's review three (3) maps of the Muscogee (Creek) Nation and Broken Arrow, Oklahoma, showing that 1004 West Fargo Lane, Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012 is within the Nation's boundaries. Dkt. No. 70-2. The Court finds this sufficient to demonstrate by a preponderance of the evidence that the location of the charged events is within Indian Country. A jury, however, will determine the factual question of whether anything of a criminal nature occurred at the 1004 West Fargo Lane address.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the motion to determine Indian country as a matter of law filed by the United States of America at Dkt. No. 70 is GRANTED.


Summaries of

United States v. Thompson

United States District Court, Northern District of Oklahoma
Aug 18, 2022
No. 22-CR-118-JFH (N.D. Okla. Aug. 18, 2022)
Case details for

United States v. Thompson

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. GARRIN MICHAEL THOMPSON, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of Oklahoma

Date published: Aug 18, 2022

Citations

No. 22-CR-118-JFH (N.D. Okla. Aug. 18, 2022)