From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Thomas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Aug 29, 2012
Crim. Mo. 12-400 (FSH) (D.N.J. Aug. 29, 2012)

Opinion

Crim. Mo. 12-400 (FSH)

08-29-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. WINSTON THOMAS


Hon. Faith S. Hochberg


CONTINUANCE ORDER

This matter having come before the Court on the joint application of Paul J. Fishman, United States Attorney for the District of New Jersey (Lisa M. Colone, Assistant U.S. Attorney, appearing), and defendant Winston Thomas (Christopher Patella, Esq., appearing), for an order granting a continuance of the proceedings in the above-captioned matter through and including January 15, 2013, and the defendant being aware that he has the right to have the matter brought to trial within 70 days of the date of his appearance before a judicial officer of this court pursuant to Title 18 of the United States Code, Section 3161(c)(1), and as the defendant has consented to such a continuance, and for good and sufficient cause shown,

IT IS THE FINDING OF THIS COURT that this action should be continued for the following reasons;

1. Plea negotiations are currently in progress, and both the United States and the defendant desire additional time to finalize a plea agreement, which would render trial of this matter unnecessary;

2. The defendant has consented to the aforementioned continuance;

3. Pursuant to Title 18 of the United States Code, Section 3161(h)(8), the ends of justice served by granting the continuance outweigh the beet interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

WHEREFORE, on this 29 day of August, 2012,

IT IS ORDERED that this action be, and hereby is, continued through and including January 15, 2013; and it is further

ORDERED that the period from and including August 22, 2012, through and including January 15, 2013, shall be excludable in computing time under the Speedy Trial Act of 1974, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(h)(8); and it is further

ORDERED that the calendar for this matter shall be revised as follows:

Defense motions: November 9, 2012
Opposition: November 30, 2012
Reply: December 14, 2012
Motions hearing: To be set
Trial: January 15, 2013

______________________

HON. FAITH S. HOCHBERG

United States District Judge

______________________
Christopher Patella, Esq.
Counsel for Winston Thomas


Summaries of

United States v. Thomas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Aug 29, 2012
Crim. Mo. 12-400 (FSH) (D.N.J. Aug. 29, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Thomas

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. WINSTON THOMAS

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Date published: Aug 29, 2012

Citations

Crim. Mo. 12-400 (FSH) (D.N.J. Aug. 29, 2012)