From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Thomas

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 30, 2012
472 F. App'x 198 (4th Cir. 2012)

Opinion

No. 11-7679

04-30-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. LENDRO MICHAEL THOMAS, Defendant - Appellant.

Lendro Michael Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. John Francis Purcell, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge. (1:03-cr-00189-JFM-1)

Before GREGORY, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lendro Michael Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. John Francis Purcell, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Lendro Michael Thomas appeals the district court's order denying Thomas' Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(a) motion to correct his sentence, which was imposed in May of 2005. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. Thomas, No. 1:03-cr-00189-JFM-1 (D. Md. Nov. 30, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

United States v. Thomas

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 30, 2012
472 F. App'x 198 (4th Cir. 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Thomas

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. LENDRO MICHAEL THOMAS…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Apr 30, 2012

Citations

472 F. App'x 198 (4th Cir. 2012)