From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Thomas

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Dec 29, 2021
No. CR19-210RAJ (W.D. Wash. Dec. 29, 2021)

Opinion

CR19-210RAJ

12-29-2021

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ALLAN B. THOMAS and JOANN E. THOMAS, Defendants.


ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL

HONORABLE RICHARD A. JONES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The Court having held a status conference concerning the trial date in this matter at which defense counsel for Allan Thomas represented that he could not effectively prepare for, and try, this case on the currently scheduled date of January 4, 2022, due to a medical issue;

Both defendants having moved for a continuance of the trial date in order to allow counsel for Allan Thomas time to address the issue and to prepare for and represent his client at trial;

And both defendants having indicated on the record that they are willing to waive their right to a speedy trial until April 30, 2022, in order to allow counsel for Allan Thomas effectively to prepare for and represent his client;

THE COURT FINDS, based upon the representations made by defense counsel for Allan Thomas, that defense counsel could not effectively represent Allan Thomas if trial were to proceed on the currently scheduled date of January 4, 2022;

THE COURT FURTHER FINDS that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a more speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), (B)(i) & (iv).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the defendants' motion to continue the trial date is GRANTED and the current trial date of January 4, 2022, is hereby stricken;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that trial is now SCHEDULED to begin on January 31, 2022, at 9:00 a.m.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the time between today's date and January 31, 2022, is excluded in computing the time within which trial must commence, because the ends of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendants in a more speedy trial. See 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A). Failure to grant this continuance would likely make trial impossible, could result in a miscarriage of justice, and would deny counsel for the defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. See Id. § 3161(B)(i) & (iv).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court will hold a status conference at 10:00 a.m. on January 10, 2022, in order to consider whether an additional continuance is required until April 25, 2022, based upon defense counsel's medical condition.


Summaries of

United States v. Thomas

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Dec 29, 2021
No. CR19-210RAJ (W.D. Wash. Dec. 29, 2021)
Case details for

United States v. Thomas

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ALLAN B. THOMAS and JOANN E…

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Dec 29, 2021

Citations

No. CR19-210RAJ (W.D. Wash. Dec. 29, 2021)