From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Terrell

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Feb 26, 2019
No. 18-7538 (4th Cir. Feb. 26, 2019)

Opinion

No. 18-7538

02-26-2019

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. KAMEL O'MEEK TERRELL, Defendant - Appellant.

Kamel O'Meek Terrell, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder, Chief District Judge. (1:14-cr-00330-TDS-1; 1:18-cv-00651-TDS-JEP) Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and AGEE and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kamel O'Meek Terrell, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Kamel O'Meek Terrell seeks to appeal the district court's order adopting the magistrate judge's recommendation and dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion without prejudice. This Court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders and certain interlocutory and collateral orders. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291, 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). Because the district court dismissed without prejudice specifically directing Terrell to file an amended motion on the proper § 2255 forms, we conclude the district court's dismissal order is neither a final judgment nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. See Goode v. Cent. Va. Legal Aid Soc'y, Inc., 807 F.3d 619, 623 (4th Cir. 2015). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

In Goode, we remanded to the district court with instructions to allow amendment of the complaint. Id. at 630. Here, however, the district court already has afforded Terrell the opportunity to amend. Accordingly, we direct on remand that the district court, in its discretion, either afford Terrell another opportunity to file an amended motion or dismiss the motion with prejudice, thereby rendering its dismissal order a final, appealable judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED AND REMANDED


Summaries of

United States v. Terrell

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Feb 26, 2019
No. 18-7538 (4th Cir. Feb. 26, 2019)
Case details for

United States v. Terrell

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. KAMEL O'MEEK TERRELL…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Feb 26, 2019

Citations

No. 18-7538 (4th Cir. Feb. 26, 2019)