From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Terrell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 19, 2011
Case No. 2:10-CR-477 LKK (E.D. Cal. Sep. 19, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 2:10-CR-477 LKK

09-19-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. LONNIE TERRELL, ANTHONY MONTANO, ALEX LINDBERG, JEREMY TERRELL, NICHOLAS ROMAN, and RUTH JIMENEZ, Defendants.

Respectfully submitted, DANIEL BRODERICK Federal Defender MICHAEL PETRIK, Jr. Assistant Federal Defender Attorney for Anthony Montano DAVID DRATMAN Attorney for Lonnie Terrell RONALD PETERS Attorney for Alex Lindberg DANIEL SCHULTZ Attorney for Jeremy Terrell LISA MEIER Attorney for Nicholas Roman KELLY BABINEAU Attorney for Ruth Jimenez BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney MICHAEL ANDERSON Assistant U.S. Attorney


DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar #89424

Federal Defender

MICHAEL PETRIK, Jr., Bar #177913

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Defendant

ANTHONY MONTANO

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE TO November 8, 2011


Judge: Hon. Lawrence K. Karlton

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED between plaintiff, United States of America, and defendants, LONNIE TERRELL, ANTHONY MONTANO, ALEX LINDBERG, JEREMY TERRELL, NICHOLAS ROMAN, and RUTH JIMENEZ, through their respective attorneys, that the Court should vacate the status conference scheduled for September 20, 2011, at 9:15 a.m., and reset it for November 8, 2011, at 9:15 a.m.

Counsel for defendants require further time to review discovery and to negotiate with the government in an effort to resolve this matter.

It is further stipulated by the parties that the Court should exclude the period from the date of this order through November 8, 2011, when it computes the time within which the trial of the above criminal prosecution must commence for purposes of the Speedy Trial Act. The parties stipulate that the ends of justice served by granting defendants' request for a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendants' in a speedy trial, and that this is an appropriate exclusion of time for defense preparation within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B) (Local Code T4).

Respectfully submitted,

DANIEL BRODERICK

Federal Defender

MICHAEL PETRIK, Jr.

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Anthony Montano

DAVID DRATMAN

Attorney for Lonnie Terrell

RONALD PETERS

Attorney for Alex Lindberg

DANIEL SCHULTZ

Attorney for Jeremy Terrell

LISA MEIER

Attorney for Nicholas Roman

KELLY BABINEAU

Attorney for Ruth Jimenez

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

MICHAEL ANDERSON

Assistant U.S. Attorney

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED. The Court Specifically finds that the ends of justice served by granting of such a continuance outweigh the interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. The Court orders time excluded from the date of this order through the status conference on November 8, 2011, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B) (Local Code T4).

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

United States v. Terrell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 19, 2011
Case No. 2:10-CR-477 LKK (E.D. Cal. Sep. 19, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Terrell

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. LONNIE TERRELL, ANTHONY MONTANO…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 19, 2011

Citations

Case No. 2:10-CR-477 LKK (E.D. Cal. Sep. 19, 2011)