From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Terrazas

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Sep 22, 2005
149 F. App'x 689 (9th Cir. 2005)

Opinion

Submitted September 12, 2005.

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

James P. Hagarty, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Yakima, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Nicholas W. Marchi, Esq., Kennewicik, WA, for Defendant-Appellant.


Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington, Edward F. Shea, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CR-03-00204-EFS.

Before: REINHARDT, RYMER, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Jesus Terrazas appeals his 120-month sentence imposed following a guilty plea to possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

Appellant contends that the district court erred in its denial of his motion for a safety valve, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f). We disagree, as the record supports a finding that appellant had a leadership role in this offense. Because his role

Page 690.

as a leader in the offense precludes the application of a safety valve, the district court did not err. See United States v. Sherpa, 110 F.3d 656, 659-60 (9th Cir.1996).

Appellant also contends that the district court violated his due process rights when it determined that he held a leadership role in the offense, and thus he is entitled to re-sentencing, pursuant to Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004), and United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). However, because appellant was sentenced pursuant to the applicable mandatory minimum sentence and not the United States Sentencing Guidelines, we reject his contention. See United States v. Cardenas, 405 F.3d 1046, 1048 (9th Cir.2005) (noting that Booker has no bearing on mandatory minimum cases).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

United States v. Terrazas

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Sep 22, 2005
149 F. App'x 689 (9th Cir. 2005)
Case details for

United States v. Terrazas

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee, v. Jesus TERRAZAS…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Sep 22, 2005

Citations

149 F. App'x 689 (9th Cir. 2005)