Opinion
CASE NO. 11CR2152-JLS
11-15-2012
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. TEPPER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (3), Defendant.
JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL
IT APPEARING that the defendant is now entitled to be discharged for the reason that _____ an indictment has been filed in another case against the defendant and the Court has granted the motion of the Government for dismissal of this case, without prejudice; or _____ the Court has dismissed the case for unnecessary delay; or X the Court has granted the motion of the Government for dismissal, without prejudice; or _____ the Court has granted the motion of the defendant for a judgment of acquittal; or _____ a jury has been waived, and the Court has found the defendant not guilty; or _____ the jury has returned its verdict, finding the defendant not guilty; X of the offense(s) as charged in the Indictment:
18 USC §371 Conspiracy to defraud the United States and to make false statements under penalty of perjury in documents required by Immigration Law; 18 USC §1546 Making false statement under penalty of perjury in document required by Immigration Law; 18 USC §982 Criminal Forfeiture.
IT IS THEREFORE ADJUDGED that the defendant is hereby discharged.
________
Janis L. Sammartino
U.S. District Judge