From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Taylor

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Jan 30, 2017
No. CV16-2063 PHX DGC (DMF) (D. Ariz. Jan. 30, 2017)

Opinion

No. CV16-2063 PHX DGC (DMF) No. CR07-1231 PHX DGC

01-30-2017

United States of America, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Claney Lee Taylor, Defendant/Movant.


ORDER

Defendant/Movant, Claney Lee Taylor, has filed a motion to vacate sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Doc. 1. On August 26, 2016 Plaintiff/Respondent, United States of America, filed a motion to stay. Doc. 6. The motion is fully briefed. United States Magistrate Judge Deborah M. Fine has issued a report and recommendation ("R&R") recommending that the motion to stay be granted. Doc. 13. No objection has been filed, which relieves the Court of its obligation to review the R&R. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). The Court will accept the R&R and grant the motion to stay.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The R&R (Doc. 13) is accepted.

2. The motion to stay (Doc. 6) is granted.

3. The government's answer/opposition to the motion to vacate sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 shall be filed no later than 14 days after the
Supreme Court issues its decision in Beckles v. United States, No. 15-8544 (cert. granted June 27, 2016).

Dated this 30th day of January, 2017.

/s/_________

David G. Campbell

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Taylor

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Jan 30, 2017
No. CV16-2063 PHX DGC (DMF) (D. Ariz. Jan. 30, 2017)
Case details for

United States v. Taylor

Case Details

Full title:United States of America, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Claney Lee Taylor…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Date published: Jan 30, 2017

Citations

No. CV16-2063 PHX DGC (DMF) (D. Ariz. Jan. 30, 2017)