From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Taylor

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 25, 2011
No. 2:10-cr-432 GEB (E.D. Cal. Aug. 25, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2:10-cr-432 GEB

08-25-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL TAYLOR, Defendant.

TIMOTHY ZINDEL Assistant Federal Defender Attorney for MICHAEL TAYLOR T. Zindel for M. Beckwith MICHAEL BECKWITH Assistant U.S. Attorney


DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar #89424

Federal Defender

TIMOTHY ZINDEL, Bar #158377

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Defendant

MICHAEL TAYLOR

STIPULATION AND ORDER

CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE

AND EXCLUDING TIME


Date: August 26, 2011

Time: 9:00 a.m.

Judge: Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED between plaintiff, United States of America, and defendant, MICHAEL TAYLOR, through their respective attorneys, that the status conference presently scheduled for August 26, 2011, may be continued to November 4, 2011, at 9:00 a.m.

The Federal Defender substituted into the case and has requested additional discovery, and ordered some investigation. Additionally, I will be gone on family medical leave from September 12, 2011 for 5 weeks and will not be available to complete that task until I return. Accordingly, the parties stipulate and agree that the interests of justice served by granting this continuance therefore outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(7)(B)(iv).

Respectfully submitted,

DANIEL J. BRODERICK

Federal Defender

TIMOTHY ZINDEL

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for MICHAEL TAYLOR

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

T. Zindel for M. Beckwith

MICHAEL BECKWITH Assistant U.S. Attorney

ORDER

The status conference is continued to November 4, 2011, at 9:00 a.m. For the reasons set forth above, the court finds that the ends of justice to be served by a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial and therefore excludes time through

November 4, 2011, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Taylor

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 25, 2011
No. 2:10-cr-432 GEB (E.D. Cal. Aug. 25, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Taylor

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL TAYLOR, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 25, 2011

Citations

No. 2:10-cr-432 GEB (E.D. Cal. Aug. 25, 2011)