From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Tate

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division
Feb 7, 2022
3:16-CR-00074-MOC-DSC-1 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 7, 2022)

Opinion

3:16-CR-00074-MOC-DSC-1

02-07-2022

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. REGINALD DAUSHAWN EARL TATE, Defendant.


ORDER

Max O. Cogburn Jr. United States District Judge

THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendant's pro se Motion for Compassionate Release. (Doc. No. 406).

Having reviewed Defendant's Motion, the Court finds that a response from the Government is needed to fully consider their merits. Consequently, the Court enters the following Order.

ORDER

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Government SHALL RESPOND to Defendant's Motion for Compassionate Release within 20 days of the entry of this Order.


Summaries of

United States v. Tate

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division
Feb 7, 2022
3:16-CR-00074-MOC-DSC-1 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 7, 2022)
Case details for

United States v. Tate

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. REGINALD DAUSHAWN EARL TATE, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division

Date published: Feb 7, 2022

Citations

3:16-CR-00074-MOC-DSC-1 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 7, 2022)

Citing Cases

Tate v. Warden

The petitioner was previously found eligible for appointment of counsel in his criminal case. See United…