From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Tarpkin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA
Oct 25, 2017
No. 1:01-cr-58-TRM-CHS-01 (E.D. Tenn. Oct. 25, 2017)

Opinion

No. 1:01-cr-58-TRM-CHS-01

10-25-2017

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. JERMAINE TARPKIN


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JERMAINE TARPKIN ("Defendant") appeared for a hearing on October 16, 2017 in accordance with Rule 32.1 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure on the Petition for a Warrant or Summons for an Offender Under Supervision ("Petition").

Defendant was placed under oath and informed of his constitutional rights. It was determined that Defendant wished to be represented by an attorney and he qualified for appointed counsel. Federal Defender Services of Eastern Tennessee was appointed to represent Defendant. It was also determined that Defendant had been provided with, and reviewed with counsel, a copy of the Petition.

The Government moved that Defendant be detained without bail pending his revocation hearing before U.S. District Judge McDonough. Defendant waived his right to a preliminary hearing but requested a detention hearing, which was held. U.S. Probation Officers Joey Byars and Doug Corn both testified regarding the factual allegations set forth in the Petition and related matters. After being sworn, Defendant testified on his own behalf. Both parties presented their respective arguments, which were fully considered by the Court

Based upon the Petition and Defendant's waiver of preliminary hearing, the Court finds there is probable cause to believe Defendant has committed a violation of his conditions of supervised release as alleged in the Petition.

Pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.1(a)(6), and based on the proof as addressed in greater detail during the detention hearing, the Court finds Defendant has not carried his burden of demonstrating by clear and convincing evidence that, if released at this time, he would not pose a danger to another person or to the community.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:

(1) Counsel for Defendant and the Government shall confer and make best efforts to submit to U.S. District Judge McDonough a proposed Agreed Order with respect to an appropriate disposition of the Petition for Warrant for Offender Under Supervision.

(2) In the event counsel are unable to reach agreement with respect to an appropriate disposition of the Petition for Warrant for Offender Under Supervision, they shall request a hearing before U.S. District Judge McDonough.

(3) The Government's motion that Defendant be DETAINED WITHOUT BAIL pending further order from this Court is GRANTED.

SO ORDERED.

ENTER.

/s/_________

SUSAN K. LEE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Tarpkin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA
Oct 25, 2017
No. 1:01-cr-58-TRM-CHS-01 (E.D. Tenn. Oct. 25, 2017)
Case details for

United States v. Tarpkin

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. JERMAINE TARPKIN

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA

Date published: Oct 25, 2017

Citations

No. 1:01-cr-58-TRM-CHS-01 (E.D. Tenn. Oct. 25, 2017)