From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Tapia

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 14, 2022
22 Cr. 532 (GHW) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 14, 2022)

Opinion

22 Cr. 532 (GHW)

12-14-2022

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ALEX SANTIAGO RODRIGUEZ TAPIA, JUAN CARLOS LOPEZ LASA, and JOSE WALTER HERNANDEZ LOZANO, Defendants.

Zawadi S Baharanyi,, Esq. Attorney for Defendant Alex Santiago Rodriguez Tapia Harvey Fishbein, Esq. Attorney for Defendant Juan Carlos Lopez Lasa Daniel McGuinness, Esq. Attorney for Defendant Jose Walter Hernandez Lozano


Zawadi S Baharanyi,, Esq. Attorney for Defendant Alex Santiago Rodriguez Tapia

Harvey Fishbein, Esq. Attorney for Defendant Juan Carlos Lopez Lasa

Daniel McGuinness, Esq. Attorney for Defendant Jose Walter Hernandez Lozano

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

GREGORY H. WOODS, District Judge:

WHEREAS the above-referenced defendants (the "Defendants") have sought from the Government access to certain recordings, electronic communications, and data and other materials that disclose the identities of individuals who acted at the direction of law enforcement in connection with the underlying investigation (the "Protected Materials"), which are discoverable pursuant to Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure ("Rule 16");

WHEREAS the Government desires to protect the identities of the participants in the communications reflected in the Protected Materials; 1

WHEREAS the Protected Materials, if disseminated to third parties or outside the United States, could, among other things, implicate the safety of others and impede ongoing investigations; and

WHEREAS, in the interest of expediting the discovery process, the Defendants, by their undersigned attorneys, consent to the entry of this protective order; and for good cause shown;

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. The Protected Materials shall be used by the Defendants, their counsel, and their counsel's agents only for purposes of defending the charges, in connection with sentencing, and pursuing any appeals, in this criminal action. To the extent the Protected Materials are shown to additional persons consistent with the terms set forth below, those additional persons may only use the Protected Materials in connection with this criminal action.

2. The Government will mark all items subject to this protective order in a manner indicating their protected status.

3. The Protected Materials and the information and identities contained or disclosed therein:

(a) Shall be used by the Defendants and their counsel only for purposes of this action;
(b) Shall not be transmitted, disseminated, or possessed outside the territorial United States;
(c) Shall not be disclosed in any form by the Defendants or their counsel except as set forth in paragraph 3(d) below;
(d) May be disclosed only by the Defendants' counsel and only to the following persons (hereinafter "Designated Persons"):
(i) investigative, secretarial, clerical, paralegal and student personnel employed full-time or part-time by the defendant's attorney;
(ii) independent expert witnesses, investigators or advisors retained by the defendant in connection with this action; or
(iii) upon a motion by the defendant pursuant to paragraph 5 below, to show (but not provide copies of) Protected Materials to such other persons as hereafter may be authorized by the Court; and
(e) Shall be returned to the Government following the conclusion of this case.

4. The Defendants and their counsel shall provide a copy of this protective order to Designated Persons to whom the Protected Materials are disclosed pursuant to paragraph 3(d)(i), (ii) and (iii). Designated Persons shall be subject to the terms of this protective order.

5. Defense counsel may, on notice to the Government, seek authorization of the Court to show (but not provide copies of) certain specified discovery materials to persons whose access to discovery materials is otherwise prohibited by the preceding paragraphs, if it is determined by the Court that such access is necessary for the purpose of preparing the defense of the case.

6. The provisions of this order shall not be construed as preventing the disclosure of any information in any motion, hearing, trial, sentencing, or appeal proceeding held in this action or to any judge or magistrate of this Court for purposes of this action.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Tapia

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 14, 2022
22 Cr. 532 (GHW) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 14, 2022)
Case details for

United States v. Tapia

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ALEX SANTIAGO RODRIGUEZ TAPIA, JUAN CARLOS…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Dec 14, 2022

Citations

22 Cr. 532 (GHW) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 14, 2022)