From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Juan Tang

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 26, 2021
2:20-CR-00134-JAM (E.D. Cal. Jul. 26, 2021)

Opinion

2:20-CR-00134-JAM

07-26-2021

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JUAN TANG, Defendant.

Malcolm Segal, Emily E. Doringer, SEGAL & ASSOCIATES, PC, Thomas A. Johnson, Kristy M. Horton, Patrick Wong, Esq. Attorneys for Defendant JUAN TANG


Malcolm Segal, Emily E. Doringer, SEGAL & ASSOCIATES, PC, Thomas A. Johnson, Kristy M. Horton, Patrick Wong, Esq. Attorneys for Defendant JUAN TANG

[PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXONERATION OF THE PROPERTY BOND

JEREMY D. PETERSON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On September 9, 2020, the Third Party Custodians of Juan Tang posted their property to satisfy the $750,000 secured bond. See ECF Doc. No. 59. On July 23, 2021, the Court signed the order dismissing the above-entitled case. Therefore, it is hereby requested that the secured appearance bond be exonerated for the property located in Foster City, California, and that the Clerk of the District Court be directed to re-convey the property back to the owners.

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appearance bond secured by a Deed of Trust against the real property located Foster City, California, ECF Doc. No. 59, is hereby exonerated. The Clerk of the Court is directed to re-convey the property back to the owners, Steven X. Cui and Huina Yu.


Summaries of

United States v. Juan Tang

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 26, 2021
2:20-CR-00134-JAM (E.D. Cal. Jul. 26, 2021)
Case details for

United States v. Juan Tang

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JUAN TANG, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jul 26, 2021

Citations

2:20-CR-00134-JAM (E.D. Cal. Jul. 26, 2021)