From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Talley

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 8, 2022
22-cr-00028-SI-1 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 8, 2022)

Opinion

22-cr-00028-SI-1

08-08-2022

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JAMES EARL TALLEY, Defendant.


SCHEDULING ORDER AND ORDER EXCLUDING TIME

SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Judge.

On August 8, 2022, the Court held a status conference in this case. During the conference, counsel for the government stated that the government was insisting on proceeding with a jury trial, rather than stipulated-testimony bench trial (or a conditional plea pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 11(a)(2)), because the government wished to develop a fuller factual record for defendant's anticipated appeal of the denial of the motion to suppress. In response, defense counsel proposed that the Court hold the evidentiary hearing that defendant had requested in connection with the motion to suppress and that the Court reconsider its ruling denying the motion to suppress. The Court agreed with defendant's proposal and scheduled an evidentiary hearing for 10:00 am on August 22, 2022.

In light of the Court's reconsideration of defendant's motion to suppress and scheduling of an evidentiary hearing on the motion, the Court finds it appropriate to exclude time from August 8, 2022 until such time as the Court issues a further order on the motion to suppress. See 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(1)(D).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Talley

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 8, 2022
22-cr-00028-SI-1 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 8, 2022)
Case details for

United States v. Talley

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JAMES EARL TALLEY, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Aug 8, 2022

Citations

22-cr-00028-SI-1 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 8, 2022)