From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Tadlock

United States District Court for the Eastern District of California
Feb 23, 2017
2:16-CR-00146-TLN-AC (E.D. Cal. Feb. 23, 2017)

Opinion

2:16-CR-00146-TLN-AC

02-23-2017

United States v. Tadlock


OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL DEFENDER

HEATHER E. WILLIAMS Federal Defender LINDA C. ALLISON Chief Assistant Defender memorandum To: Honorable Troy L. Nunley United States District Court Judge From: Carolyn M. Wiggin, Assistant Federal Defender

Heather Phillips is a certified law clerk who has been admitted to practice in this district pursuant to Rule 181. She is under my direct supervision. I have worked with her on the brief and will directly supervise the oral argument on appeal.

Wendy M. Tadlock signed a consent form pursuant to Local Rule 181 to allow Ms. Phillips to represent her in all future proceedings in this court. The next scheduled proceeding is the oral argument on the appeal set for March 16, 2017 at 9:30 a.m.

If the court so approves, a signed copy of this document will be maintained in the defendant's file.

X Approved

___ Not Approved DATED: February 23, 2017

/s/_________

Troy L. Nunley

United States District Court Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Tadlock

United States District Court for the Eastern District of California
Feb 23, 2017
2:16-CR-00146-TLN-AC (E.D. Cal. Feb. 23, 2017)
Case details for

United States v. Tadlock

Case Details

Full title:United States v. Tadlock

Court:United States District Court for the Eastern District of California

Date published: Feb 23, 2017

Citations

2:16-CR-00146-TLN-AC (E.D. Cal. Feb. 23, 2017)