From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Swinton

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Nov 24, 2015
623 F. App'x 89 (4th Cir. 2015)

Opinion

No. 15-7274

11-24-2015

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. CLIFTON JERMAINE SWINTON, a/k/a Compton, Defendant - Appellant.

Clifton Jermaine Swinton, Appellant Pro Se. Arthur Bradley Parham, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, Chief District Judge. (4:09-cr-01145-TLW-1) Before NIEMEYER, KING, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Clifton Jermaine Swinton, Appellant Pro Se. Arthur Bradley Parham, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Clifton Jermaine Swinton appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Swinton, No. 4:09-cr-01145-TLW-1 (D.S.C. July 29, 2015). We deny Swinton's motions for a transcript at government expense and to appoint counsel, and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

United States v. Swinton

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Nov 24, 2015
623 F. App'x 89 (4th Cir. 2015)
Case details for

United States v. Swinton

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. CLIFTON JERMAINE…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Nov 24, 2015

Citations

623 F. App'x 89 (4th Cir. 2015)