Opinion
W-22-CR-00101-ADA(1)
03-18-2024
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. TREVOR SWIFT,
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
ALAN D ALBRIGHT UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.
A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations of the magistrate judge within fourteen days after being served with a copy of the report and recommendation, thereby securing de novo review by the district court. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). A district court need not consider “[f]rivolous, conclusive, or general objections.” Battle v. U.S. Parole Comm'n, 834 F.2d 419, 421 (5th Cir. 1987) (quoting Nettles v. Wainwright, 677 F.2d 404, 410 n.8 (5th Cir. 1982) (en banc), overruled on other grounds by Douglass v. United States Auto. Ass'n, 79 F.3d 1415 (5th Cir. 1996)).
Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Jeffrey C. Manske. ECF No. 86. The report recommends Defendant SWIFT's Motion to Supress (ECF No. 42) be be DENIED. The report and recommendation was filed on October 12, 2023.
Defendant filed objections on November 9, 2023. ECF No. 92. The Court has conducted a de novo review of the motion to suppress, the responses, the report and recommendation, the objection to the report and recommendation, and the applicable laws. After that thorough review, the Court is persuaded that the Magistrate Judge's findings and recommendation should be adopted.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Jeffrey C. Manske., ECF No. 86, is ADOPTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's objections are OVERRULED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Suppress, ECF No. 42, is DENIED in accordance with the Report and Recommendation.