From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Swartz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA Wheeling
Jan 21, 2021
CRIM. ACTION NO. 5:20-CR-3 (N.D.W. Va. Jan. 21, 2021)

Opinion

CRIM. ACTION NO. 5:20-CR-3

01-21-2021

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. GORDON LLOYD SWARTZ, IV, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

On this day, the above-styled matter came before this Court for consideration of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge James P. Mazzone [Doc. 46]. Pursuant to this Court's Local Rules, this action was referred to Magistrate Judge Mazzone for submission of a proposed report and recommendation ("R&R"). Magistrate Judge Mazzone filed his R&R on December 11, 2020, wherein he recommends that Defendant's Motion for Suppression of Evidence [Doc. 30] be denied.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(c), this Court is required to make a de novo review of those portions of the magistrate judge's findings to which objection is made. However, the Court is not required to review, under a de novo or any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of the magistrate judge as to those portions of the findings or recommendation to which no objections are addressed. Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985). In addition, failure to file timely objections constitutes a waiver of de novo review and the right to appeal this Court's Order. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Snyder v. Ridenour , 889 F.2d 1363, 1366 (4th Cir. 1989); United States v. Schronce , 727 F.2d 91, 94 (4th Cir. 1984). Here, objections to Magistrate Judge Mazzone's R&R were due within fourteen (14) days of service, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Accordingly, objections were due by December 28, 2020. To date, no objections have been filed. Accordingly, this Court will review the R&R for clear error.

Upon careful review of the above, it is the opinion of this Court that the Report and Recommendation [Doc. 46] should be, and is, hereby ORDERED ADOPTED for the reasons more fully stated in the magistrate judge's report. Accordingly, Defendant's Motion for Suppression of Evidence [Doc. 30] is hereby DENIED.

It is so ORDERED.

The Clerk is directed to transmit copies of this Order to any counsel of record herein.

DATED: January 21, 2021.

/s/ _________

JOHN PRESTON BAILEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Swartz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA Wheeling
Jan 21, 2021
CRIM. ACTION NO. 5:20-CR-3 (N.D.W. Va. Jan. 21, 2021)
Case details for

United States v. Swartz

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. GORDON LLOYD SWARTZ, IV, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA Wheeling

Date published: Jan 21, 2021

Citations

CRIM. ACTION NO. 5:20-CR-3 (N.D.W. Va. Jan. 21, 2021)