From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Sutherland

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Aug 6, 2012
CRIM NO.11 CR-20229-1 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 6, 2012)

Opinion

CRIM NO.11 CR-20229-1

08-06-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT SUTHERLAND, Defendant.


ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO WITHDRAW

The matter has come before the court regarding the continued representation of William P. Hackett as counsel for Defendant Scott Sutherland. Upon review of the motion and brief, the court has determined that there is sufficient reason for Mr. Hackett to be allowed to withdraw as counsel. Therefore, the Motion to Withdraw is GRANTED.

IT IS ORDERED that the Federal Defender's Office appoint a member of the CJA panel to represent defendant for the remainder of these proceedings.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that substitute counsel file an appearance and meet with Defendant as soon as practicable.

______________

ROBERT H. CLELAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record on this date, August 6, 2012, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

Lisa Wagner

Case Manager and Deputy Clerk

(313) 234-5522


Summaries of

United States v. Sutherland

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Aug 6, 2012
CRIM NO.11 CR-20229-1 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 6, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Sutherland

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT SUTHERLAND, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Aug 6, 2012

Citations

CRIM NO.11 CR-20229-1 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 6, 2012)