From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Susskind

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Sep 4, 1992
975 F.2d 1206 (6th Cir. 1992)

Opinion

Nos. 91-1003 to 91-1005.

September 4, 1992.

Before: MERRITT, Chief Judge; KEITH, KENNEDY, MARTIN, JONES, MILBURN, GUY, NELSON, RYAN, BOGGS, NORRIS, SUHRHEINRICH, SILER, and BATCHELDER, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of these cases en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:

The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket as a pending appeal.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and these cases are restored to the docket as pending appeals.

The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule the cases for oral argument as soon as practicable.


Summaries of

United States v. Susskind

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Sep 4, 1992
975 F.2d 1206 (6th Cir. 1992)
Case details for

United States v. Susskind

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. JEROME A. SUSSKIND…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: Sep 4, 1992

Citations

975 F.2d 1206 (6th Cir. 1992)

Citing Cases

Maryland Committee Against the Gun Ban v. Simms

A forthwith subpoena, unlike a search warrant or any other subpoena for that matter, is served upon a person…

U.S. v. Susskind

" A majority of the court's active judges voted to grant the petition, and the panel decision was vacated by…