Opinion
2:20-CR-00298-GMN-EJY 2:20-CR-00299-GMN-EJY
12-06-2022
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ANTHONY SULLIVAN, Defendant.
RUSSELL E. MARSH, ESQUIRE SUNETHRA MURALIDHARA Attorneys for Anthony Sullivan JASON M. FRIERSON UNITED STATES ATTORNEY KIMBERLY ANNE SOKOLICH Assistant U.S. Attorney
RUSSELL E. MARSH, ESQUIRE SUNETHRA MURALIDHARA Attorneys for Anthony Sullivan
JASON M. FRIERSON UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
KIMBERLY ANNE SOKOLICH Assistant U.S. Attorney
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SENTENCING HEARING (Fifth Request)
GLORIA M. NAVARRO UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, between the United States of America, by and through its attorney, JASON M. FRIERSON, United States Attorney, through KIMBERLY ANNE SOKOLICH, Assistant United States Attorney; and Defendant ANTHONY SULLIVAN, by and through his counsel, RUSSELL E. MARSH, ESQUIRE and SUNETHRA MURALIDHARA, ESQUIRE, Wright Marsh & Levy, that the sentencing hearing currently scheduled for January 11, 2022, at 10:00 a.m. be vacated and set to a date and time convenient to this Court, but no sooner than 90 days from the current sentencing date.
This stipulation is entered into for the following reasons:
1. The parties need additional time to prepare for Defendant Anthony Sullivan's sentencing hearing.
2. The parties agree to the continuance. Mr. Sullivan is currently on pretrial release and agrees to the continuance.
3. Additionally, denial of this request for continuance could result in a miscarriage of justice.
4. The additional time requested by this Stipulation is made in good faith and not for purposes of delay.
5. This is the fifth request for a continuance of the sentencing hearing.
Respectfully submitted:
WRIGHT MARSH & LEVY
Pursuant to the Stipulation of the Parties and for good cause appearing the sentencing hearing in this matter is hereby continued. The ends of justice served by granting said continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy sentencing, since the failure to grant said continuance would be likely to result in a miscarriage of justice, and would deny the parties herein sufficient time and the opportunity within which to be able to effectively and thoroughly prepare for sentencing, taking into account the exercise of due diligence.
IS IT HEREBY ORDERED that the sentencing in the above-captioned matter currently scheduled for January 11,2022, at 10:00 a.m., be vacated and continued toApril 5, 2023, at 10:00 a.m.