From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Stubbs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Mar 19, 2014
Case No. 2:13-cr-0381-APG-CWH (D. Nev. Mar. 19, 2014)

Opinion

Case No. 2:13-cr-0381-APG-CWH

03-19-2014

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. KEVIN STUBBS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE

JUDGE'S FINDING AND

RECOMMENDATION ON MOTION TO

SUPPRESS

On December 12, 2013, defendant Kevin Stubbs filed a motion [Dkt. #34] to suppress evidence seized during the underlying vehicle search, which allegedly was conducted in violation of the Fourth Amendment. Magistrate Judge Hoffman conducted an evidentiary hearing on January 31, 2014. On February 27, 2014, Judge Hoffman entered his Finding and Recommendation [Dkt. #64], recommending that Mr. Stubbs' motion be denied. Pursuant to Local Rule IB 3-2, any objection to Judge Hoffman's Finding and Recommendation was to be filed within fourteen (14) days thereafter. No objection has been filed.

The Supreme Court has held that the courts of appeal may determine that an appeal has been waived due to the failure to file objections within the specified time. Thomas v. Am, 474 U.S. 140, 142 (1985). This circuit likewise has held that the (1) failure to file objections within the specified time and (2) failure to properly address and brief the objectionable issues waives the right to appeal the District Court's order and/or appeal factual issues from the order of the District Court. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153, 1157 (9th Cir. 1991); Britt v. Simi Valley United Sch. Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983).

The court has reviewed Judge Hoffman's Finding and Recommendation and related papers. The only necessary change to that document is the addition of the words "no" and "the" on page 5 at line 1, such that the complete sentence should read: "He confirmed that Kevin Stubbs indicated he had no knowledge regarding the status of the vehicle as embezzled or stolen." [See Dkt. #64 at 4:23-5:1.] Good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Judge Hoffman's Finding and Recommendation is accepted and approved as modified in the paragraph above. Mr. Stubbs' Motion to Suppress [Diet. #34] is hereby denied.

______________________

ANDREW P. GORDON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Stubbs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Mar 19, 2014
Case No. 2:13-cr-0381-APG-CWH (D. Nev. Mar. 19, 2014)
Case details for

United States v. Stubbs

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. KEVIN STUBBS, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Mar 19, 2014

Citations

Case No. 2:13-cr-0381-APG-CWH (D. Nev. Mar. 19, 2014)