From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Strutz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION
Jan 15, 2020
Case No. 2:19-cr-147 (N.D. Ind. Jan. 15, 2020)

Opinion

Case No. 2:19-cr-147

01-15-2020

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. ERICA STRUTZ.


FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE UPON A PLEA OF GUILTY TO: THE HONORABLE THERESA L. SPRINGMANN, CHIEF JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Upon Defendant's request to enter a plea of guilty pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, this matter came on for hearing before U.S. Magistrate Judge Andrew P. Rodovich, on January 15, 2020, with the written consents of Defendant, counsel for Defendant, and counsel for the United States of America.

The hearing on Defendant's plea of guilty was in full compliance with Rule 11, Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, before the Magistrate Judge in open court and on the record.

In consideration of that hearing and the statements made by Defendant under oath on the record and in the presence of counsel, the remarks of the Assistant United States Attorney and of counsel for Defendant,

I FIND as follows:

(1) that Defendant understands the nature of the charge against her to which the plea is offered;

(2) that Defendant understands her right to trial by jury, to persist in her plea of not guilty, to the assistance of counsel at trial, to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses, and her right against compelled self-incrimination;

(3) that Defendant understands what the maximum possible sentence is, including the effect of the supervised release term, and Defendant understands that the Sentencing Guidelines apply and that the court may depart from those guidelines under some circumstances;

(4) that the plea of guilty by Defendant has been knowingly and voluntarily made and is not the result of force or threats or of promises apart from the plea agreement between the parties;

(5) that Defendant is competent to plead guilty;

(6) that Defendant understands that her answers may later be used against her in a prosecution for perjury or false statement;

(7) that there is a factual basis for Defendant's plea; and further,

I RECOMMEND that the court accept Defendant's plea of guilty and that Defendant be adjudged guilty of the offense charged in Count 1 of the Indictment, and have sentence imposed. A Presentence Report has been ordered. Should this Findings and Recommendation be accepted and Defendant adjudged guilty, sentencing will be scheduled before Chief Judge Theresa L. Springmann by separate order and notice. The parties agreed to waive any objections to this Findings and Recommendation.

ENTERED this 15th day of January, 2020.

/s/ Andrew P. Rodovich

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Strutz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION
Jan 15, 2020
Case No. 2:19-cr-147 (N.D. Ind. Jan. 15, 2020)
Case details for

United States v. Strutz

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. ERICA STRUTZ.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION

Date published: Jan 15, 2020

Citations

Case No. 2:19-cr-147 (N.D. Ind. Jan. 15, 2020)