Opinion
23-6064
04-25-2023
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ANTEDIOUS STOWE, Defendant-Appellant.
Antedious Stowe, Appellant Pro Se.
UNPUBLISHED
Submitted: April 20, 2023
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., District Judge. (3:07-cr-00108-RJC-1)
Antedious Stowe, Appellant Pro Se.
Before KING and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM
Antedious Stowe appeals the district court's order granting in part his motion for a sentence reduction under § 404(b) of the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, 132 Stat. 5194, 5222. The court concluded that Stowe was eligible for relief and exercised its discretion to reduce his sentence, but not as low as requested. After reviewing the record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in determining the extent of the sentence reduction. See Concepcion v. United States, 142 S.Ct. 2389, 240405 (2022) (stating standard). Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment. United States v. Stowe, No. 3:07-cr-00108-RJC-1 (W.D. N.C. Jan. 10, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.