Opinion
Case No. 2:98-cr-8
07-14-2016
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. BRADFORD PAUL STORTI, Defendant.
HON. JANET T. NEFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
A petition and order for warrant and arrest warrant for defendant was entered by Judge Neff on June 21, 2016 and the warrant was executed later that day. Defendant appeared before the undersigned on June 24, 2016 with attorney Karl Numinen appearing on behalf of defendant and Paul Lochner appearing for the government.
At that hearing, the government moved for search of the devices seized from defendant pursuant to the terms of defendant's supervised release. Defendant objected to search of the device. The petition was dismissed, but the issue of the search remained and the parties were given a briefing schedule (ECF #105). Thereafter, defendant filed Defendant's Withdrawal of Objection to Government's Request for Search Warrant (ECF#106).
It is recommended that the Court order the devices searched. If evidence of criminal conduct is found on the devices, it is recommended that the United States Attorney be notified. If no evidence is found on the devices, it is recommended that they be destroyed. Date: 7/14/2016
/s/ Timothy P . Greeley
TIMOTHY P. GREELEY
United States Magistrate Judge
NOTICE TO PARTIES
You have the right to de novo review of the foregoing findings by the district judge. Any application for review must be in writing, must specify the portions of the findings or proceedings objected to, and must be filed and served no later than fourteen days after the plea hearing. See W.D. MICH. L.CR.R. 11.1(d).