From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Storti

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Aug 2, 2016
Case No: 2:98-cr-8 (W.D. Mich. Aug. 2, 2016)

Opinion

Case No: 2:98-cr-8

08-02-2016

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. BRADFORD PAUL STORTI, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation filed on July 14, 2016 by the United States Magistrate Judge in this action. The Report and Recommendation was duly served on the parties, and no objection has been made thereto within the time required by law.

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt 107) is approved and adopted as the opinion of the Court.

2. The devices seized from Defendant shall be searched. If evidence of criminal conduct is found on the devices, the United States Attorney shall be notified. If no evidence is found on the devices, they shall be destroyed. Dated: August 2, 2016

/s/Janet T. Neff

JANET T. NEFF

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Storti

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Aug 2, 2016
Case No: 2:98-cr-8 (W.D. Mich. Aug. 2, 2016)
Case details for

United States v. Storti

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. BRADFORD PAUL STORTI, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Aug 2, 2016

Citations

Case No: 2:98-cr-8 (W.D. Mich. Aug. 2, 2016)