From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Stone

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jan 25, 2013
CASE NUMBER: 10-20123 (E.D. Mich. Jan. 25, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NUMBER: 10-20123

01-25-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DAVID BRIAN STONE, et al., Defendant.


HONORABLE VICTORIA A. ROBERTS


ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR THE RETURN OF SEIZED PROPERTY OR, IN THE

ALTERNATIVE, FOR THE MONETARY EQUIVALENT OF UNRETURNED SEIZED

PROPERTY (DOC. # 820)

The Court held a hearing on January 25, 2013, to consider, among other things, whether Defendants were entitled to monetary damages under Rule 41(g) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure for the Government's alleged wrongful destruction of Defendants' property. They filed motions for the return of property under Rule 41(g).

For the reasons stated on the record, Defendants' Motion is DENIED. Defendants may file a claim under the Federal Tort Claims Act ("FTCA"). Also, the Court finds that the two year statute of limitations under the FTCA was tolled during the pendency of the criminal action. The statute of limitations under the FTCA begins to run today.

IT IS ORDERED.

________________

Victoria A. Roberts

United States District Judge
The undersigned certifies that a copy of this document was served on the attorneys of record by electronic means or U.S. Mail on January 25, 2013. Linda Vertriest
Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

United States v. Stone

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jan 25, 2013
CASE NUMBER: 10-20123 (E.D. Mich. Jan. 25, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Stone

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DAVID BRIAN STONE, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Jan 25, 2013

Citations

CASE NUMBER: 10-20123 (E.D. Mich. Jan. 25, 2013)