From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Stone

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Sep 20, 2021
No. 19-3588 (8th Cir. Sep. 20, 2021)

Opinion

19-3588

09-20-2021

United States of America Plaintiff-Appellee v. John Stone Defendant-Appellant


Unpublished

Submitted: September 15, 2021

Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Springfield

Before LOKEN, BENTON, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM

John Stone appeals the district court's order revoking a grant of conditional release. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms.

The Honorable M. Douglas Harpool, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable David P. Rush, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Missouri.

Stone was initially civilly committed under 18 U.S.C. § 4246 in 2012. In October 2018, the district court granted him conditional release under section 4246(e)(2), and imposed conditions, including that he refrain from committing a new crime or using alcohol. In March 2019, the government filed a notice of violation, and subsequent motion for revocation of conditional release under section 4246(f), alleging that Stone had violated the conditions of his release by using alcohol and committing the crime of disarming a police officer.

After careful review of the record, this court concludes that Stone's statutory and constitutional arguments relating to the denial of his request to obtain an independent mental examination prior to the revocation of his conditional release are foreclosed by this court's precedent. See United States v. Spann, 984 F.3d 711 (8th Cir. 2021), cert. denied, 209 L.Ed.2d 769 (May 17, 2021); see also United States v. O'Laughlin, 934 F.3d 840, 841 (8th Cir. 2019) (de novo review). To the extent Stone also challenges the propriety of the revocation on evidentiary grounds, this court concludes the evidence developed during the revocation proceedings supports the district court's determination that conditional release should be revoked. See United States v. Franklin, 435 F.3d 885, 889-90 (8th Cir. 2006).

The judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

United States v. Stone

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Sep 20, 2021
No. 19-3588 (8th Cir. Sep. 20, 2021)
Case details for

United States v. Stone

Case Details

Full title:United States of America Plaintiff-Appellee v. John Stone…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit

Date published: Sep 20, 2021

Citations

No. 19-3588 (8th Cir. Sep. 20, 2021)