From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Stone

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Jun 20, 1961
291 F.2d 396 (2d Cir. 1961)

Opinion

No. 423, Docket 26993.

Argued June 8, 1961.

Decided June 20, 1961.

Archibald Palmer, New York City, for defendant-appellant.

Irving Younger, Asst. U.S. Atty., New York City (Robert M. Morgenthau, U.S. Atty. for the Southern Dist. of New York, New York City, on the brief), for appellee.

Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and GOODRICH and FRIENDLY, Circuit Judges.

Of the Third Circuit, sitting by designation.


The facts alleged in the affidavits attached to defendant's notice of motion for a new trial dated April 29, 1961, if believed by a jury as they might well be, would seriously undermine any basis for convicting defendant on Count 2 of the indictment for failure to report the $3,000 payment of July 19, 1954, see 282 F.2d at page 553. Recognizing the limitations upon the scope of our review of an order denying a new trial, United States v. Johnson, 1946, 327 U.S. 106, 66 S.Ct. 464, 90 L.Ed. 562, we think nevertheless that under all the circumstances the denial here was erroneous. The new trial will, of course, include Count 1 of the indictment, the conviction on which was previously held to be subject to reversal for failure to furnish defendant with a copy of the grand jury minutes, 282 F.2d 551-552.

The judgment of conviction and the order denying a new trial are reversed and a new trial ordered. The appeal from the order denying a reduction in sentence is thereby rendered moot and the appeal therefrom is dismissed.


Summaries of

United States v. Stone

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Jun 20, 1961
291 F.2d 396 (2d Cir. 1961)
Case details for

United States v. Stone

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Michael STONE, Defendant-Appellant

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Jun 20, 1961

Citations

291 F.2d 396 (2d Cir. 1961)

Citing Cases

Com. v. Savage

Thus, in Clawns v. State, 179 Md. 644, 22 A.2d 464 (1941), the Maryland Court of Appeals affirmed the trial…