From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Stinson

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jan 23, 2013
506 F. App'x 196 (4th Cir. 2013)

Opinion

No. 12-7654

01-23-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DONZEL FREDRICKUS STINSON, a/k/a Shack, a/k/a Shaq, Defendant - Appellant.

Donzel Fredrickus Stinson, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (5:06-cr-00022-RLV-CH-20) Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Donzel Fredrickus Stinson, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Donzel Fredrickus Stinson appeals the district court's order denying his motion for a reduction in his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Stinson, No. 5:06-cr-00022-RLV-CH-20 (Aug. 23, 2012). We deny Stinson's motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

United States v. Stinson

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jan 23, 2013
506 F. App'x 196 (4th Cir. 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Stinson

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DONZEL FREDRICKUS…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jan 23, 2013

Citations

506 F. App'x 196 (4th Cir. 2013)