From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Stinnett

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Oct 20, 2006
202 F. App'x 949 (9th Cir. 2006)

Opinion

Submitted Oct. 16, 2006.

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Joseph E. Thaggard, Esq., USGF-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Great Falls, MT, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

David F. Ness, Esq., FDMT-Federal Defenders of Montana, Great Falls, MT, for Defendant-Appellant.


Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana, Sam E. Haddon, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CR-04-00128-SEH.

Before: T.G. NELSON, W. FLETCHER, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Lonnie R. Stinnett appeals from the 63-month sentence following his guilty-plea conviction for assault with a dangerous weapon in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 113(a)(3) and 1152.

Stinnett contends that the district court erred in enhancing his sentence based on recklessly endangering others during

Page 950.

flight. This contention is belied by the facts and the relevant Guideline provisions. See U.S. S.G.§§ 2A1.4, cmt. 1; 3C1.2, cmt. 2.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

United States v. Stinnett

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Oct 20, 2006
202 F. App'x 949 (9th Cir. 2006)
Case details for

United States v. Stinnett

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee, v. Lonnie R. STINNETT…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Oct 20, 2006

Citations

202 F. App'x 949 (9th Cir. 2006)