From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Stevenson

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nov 4, 1935
79 F.2d 788 (9th Cir. 1935)

Opinion

No. 7591.

November 4, 1935.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of California, Central Division; Paul J. McCormick, Judge.

Peirson M. Hall, U.S. Atty., of Los Angeles, Cal., and Will G. Beardslee, Director, Bureau of War Risk Litigation, of Washington, D.C., and Wilbur C. Pickett and Fendall Marbury, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., for the United States.

Chenoweth Whitehead, R.M. McManigal, and R.M. Chenoweth, all of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

Before WILBUR, GARRECHT, and DENMAN, Circuit Judges.


The pertinent facts in this appeal are similar to those in United States of America v. Lindholm et al. (C.C.A.) 79 F.2d 784, this day decided. The only difference worthy of mention is that instead of failing to file affidavits opposing plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, the appellant in the present case submitted defensive affidavits which were deemed insufficient.

For the reasons given in the opinion in the former case, the judgment herein is reversed.


Summaries of

United States v. Stevenson

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nov 4, 1935
79 F.2d 788 (9th Cir. 1935)
Case details for

United States v. Stevenson

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Edith L. STEVENSON, Guardian of…

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Nov 4, 1935

Citations

79 F.2d 788 (9th Cir. 1935)

Citing Cases

Aguirre v. Southern Pac. Co.

( Bank of America etc. Assn. v. Casady, 15 Cal.App.2d 163 [ 59 P.2d 444].)" [8] Plaintiff contends that the…