From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Stencil

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division
Nov 18, 2024
3:16-cr-221-MOC (W.D.N.C. Nov. 18, 2024)

Opinion

3:16-cr-221-MOC

11-18-2024

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ROBERT LESLIE STENCIL, Defendant.


ORDER

MAX O. COGBURN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant's pro se Motion for Recusal of the undersigned. (Doc. No. 662). A federal judge “shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned.” 28 U.S.C. § 455(a). “He shall also disqualify himself in the following circumstances: (1) Where he has a personal bias or prejudice concerning a party, or personal knowledge of disputed evidentiary facts concerning the proceeding....” 28 U.S.C. § 455(b)(1).

The Court makes no determination on the motion for recusal as it relates to additional judges named in the motion.

Plaintiff makes no showing as to partiality, bias, personal knowledge or any other basis warranting recusal. Nor does the record reflect any such basis.

Defendant's pro se Motion for Recusal (Doc. No. 662) is DENIED.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Stencil

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division
Nov 18, 2024
3:16-cr-221-MOC (W.D.N.C. Nov. 18, 2024)
Case details for

United States v. Stencil

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ROBERT LESLIE STENCIL, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division

Date published: Nov 18, 2024

Citations

3:16-cr-221-MOC (W.D.N.C. Nov. 18, 2024)